<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mediageek &#187; Reed Hundt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediageek.net/tag/reed-hundt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediageek.net</link>
	<description>&#34;Eclectic&#34; is just a nice way of saying, &#34;lacking focus&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 04:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Chair Choice Sparks Hope for Net Neutrality, Other Issues Less Clear</title>
		<link>http://www.mediageek.net/2009/01/fcc-chair-choice-sparks-hope-for-net-neutrality-other-issues-less-clear/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediageek.net/2009/01/fcc-chair-choice-sparks-hope-for-net-neutrality-other-issues-less-clear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 02:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[examining the mainstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership & consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net neutrality / free the internet!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barak Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julius Genachowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[network neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reed Hundt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecomm Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediageek.net/?p=1781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month Matthew Lasar dug up info on this mysterious Julius Genachowski whose name starting circulating as a candidate for Obama&#8217;s FCC Chairman. Late Monday night the news broke that Genachowski is slated to be Obama&#8217;s nominee for the job. As Matthew noted in his Ars Technica article yesterday, the public interest community is responding [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081222-in-search-of-julius-genachowski.html">Matthew Lasar dug up info on this mysterious Julius Genachowski </a>whose name starting circulating as a candidate for Obama&#8217;s FCC Chairman. Late Monday night <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123180775460975639.html">the news broke</a> that Genachowski is slated to be Obama&#8217;s nominee for the job. As Matthew noted in <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20090113-obamas-fcc-chairman-pick-hailed-by-reform-groups.html">his Ars Technica article</a> yesterday, the public interest community is responding positively to this news, primarily based upon Genachowski&#8217;s work on Obama&#8217;s <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/issues/technology/">&#8220;Technology and Innovation&#8221;</a> plan. Given that candidate Obama was specific in his support for Network Neutrality, the hope inspired by Genchowski&#8217;s likely nomination appears to be more well founded than any other news on the Net Neutrality front in the last year.</p>
<p>However, much is still unknown about Genachowski&#8217;s views on media issues, like ownership concentration and indecency enforcement. He was an assistant to Clinton-appointed FCC Chairman Reed Hundt in the 1990s, and we might learn a little bit about Genachowski by looking at his former boss&#8217; tenure at the Commission. With regard to media ownership, <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE6DC113AF93BA2575AC0A963958260&#038;sec=&#038;spon=&#038;pagewanted=print">Hundt opposed lifting the nationwide radio ownership cap</a>. The lifting of the cap&#8211;which brought on the Clear Channel era&#8211;happened with the passing of the Telecomm  Act of 1996 by Congress, signed by President Clinton, and was not decided by the Hundt FCC. Hundt was also a proponent of children&#8217;s programming requirements, while also pushing for indecency fines against the likes of Howard Stern.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re sure to learn more about Genachowski&#8217;s views on a whole panoply of communication issues when he goes up for confirmation by the Senate. Here&#8217;s hoping that his apparently progressive outlook on Net Neutrality is combined with the willingness to put the brakes on the Bush FCC&#8217;s full-speed gallop on loosening media ownership limits. I must admit that ensuring a free and open internet, along with enacting policies to stimulate high-speed broadband build-out really should be the top priority for media and telecomm, above all.</p>
<p>With the lessons learned from the 1996 Telecomm Act and the ill-considered experiment of taking away common carrier status from internet (therefore creating the need for Net Neutrality) there exists a blueprint for creating a much more vibrant, diverse and free media ecology. </p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediageek.net/2009/01/fcc-chair-choice-sparks-hope-for-net-neutrality-other-issues-less-clear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

