<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mediageek &#187; monk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediageek.net/tag/monk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediageek.net</link>
	<description>&#34;Eclectic&#34; is just a nice way of saying, &#34;lacking focus&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 04:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FCC Steps Up Pressure on Boulder Pirates</title>
		<link>http://www.mediageek.net/2009/06/fcc-steps-up-pressure-on-boulder-pirates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mediageek.net/2009/06/fcc-steps-up-pressure-on-boulder-pirates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 05:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate/free radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boulder free radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fcc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kbfr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nouo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pirate radio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediageek.net/?p=1921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A short blog post from Monk, formerly the brains behind the first iteration of Boulder Free Radio KBFR, reports that two separate unlicensed stations in Boulder, CO were recently &#8220;shut down&#8221; by the FCC. A new KBFR with new a new crew behind it has been operating in Boulder since sometime last year. Monk has [...]


No related posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://freemedia.blogspot.com/2009/05/rare-double-pirate-bust-in-boulder-co.html">A short blog post from Monk</a>, formerly <a href="http://www.mediageek.net/2004/07/boulder-free-radio-keeping-it-going/">the brains behind the first iteration of Boulder Free Radio KBFR</a>, reports that two separate unlicensed stations in Boulder, CO were recently &#8220;shut down&#8221; by the FCC.  <a href="http://www.boulderfreeradio.com">A new KBFR</a> with new a new crew behind it has been operating in Boulder since sometime last year. Monk has no other details on these recent shut downs. </p>
<p>So I set about investigating what might be going on, since <a href="http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2008/12/pirate_radio_station_kbfr_back.php">Boulder has been the site of free radio innovation for quite some time</a>. I&#8217;ve not been able to find any news reports on any bust, but a check of the FCC&#8217;s most recent enforcement actions turns up four virtually identical Notices of Unlicensed Operation (NOUO) dated May 8. Three were issued to individuals and <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2003/DOC-290805A1.html">one was issued simply to &#8220;Boulder Free Radio, Boulder, CO.&#8221;</a> There&#8217;s no indication in the NOUOs that the FCC talked to anyone associated with the station or gained access to a transmitter. Unusually, there aren&#8217;t even any street addresses listed. Likely this means that agents didn&#8217;t mail the notices, but left them at the door. </p>
<p>This evening I received email confirmation from Boulder Free Radio that there was another FCC visit to a transmitter location last Friday, May 29, and that they&#8217;re off the air. They&#8217;re planning to stay off the air for the time being while they assess the situation.  However, their <a href="http://www.boulderfreeradio.com">web radio stream</a> continues to broadcast (on the internet only, of course).</p>
<p>The current KBFR is operating according to a similar gameplan as the original station, using the tactic of separating the studio and transmitter using an internet audio stream as the studio-to-transmitter-link (STL). If the transmitter is visited they pack up shop there and move to a new location without the studio or the on-air talent being affected. This method ostensibly allows the station to have a sizable staff of DJs without having to divulge to them the location of the transmitter, or expose the DJs to liability for the unlicensed broadcast. </p>
<p>Indeed, with this method there really isn&#8217;t any need for the persons behind the web stream to even know the persons operating the transmitters. This method also has been employed during large protest actions, where a live webstream will originate from a convergence center or Independent Media Center which is then rebroadcast for the duration of the protest by anonymous, unrelated pirates.</p>
<p>Monk and the original KBFR were able to keep up this tactic for nearly five years of cat and mouse games with the unusually aggressive Denver FCC office. <a href="http://www.mediageek.net/2005/01/boulder-free-radio-gone-for-good/">He finally called it a day in January, 2005</a>. According to Monk, the FCC agent on their case</p>
<blockquote><p>
bordered on (and in talking to lawyers we know, actually crossed the line) illegal activity. He harassed private citizens at their work place (accusing them, to their bosses, of &#8216;breaking the law on company time&#8217;) and the aforementioned roommate of the original Monk from Five Years Ago. We&#8217;ve since learned that this ex-roomie of the original Monk actually had to hire a lawyer to protect himself from having just been the roommate of one of us. And HALF a DECADE ago. &#8230;</p>
<p>The reason we shut down is our fear of innocents getting blamed for things they didn&#8217;t do&#8230;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Who knows if the FCC will be that aggressive with the new KBFR, especially given that the FCC agent in question supposedly retired four years ago.</p>
<p>As for the second station Monk reports being shut down: I&#8217;ve found no other recent actions against unlicensed stations in Boulder  in the FCC&#8217;s enforcement action list. However I have heard that another station, unrelated to Boulder Free Radio, was operating. </p>


<p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mediageek.net/2009/06/fcc-steps-up-pressure-on-boulder-pirates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

