<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: free103point9 Says There&#8217;s No News in the Times about Brooklyn Microradio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediageek.net/2007/12/free103point9-says-theres-no-news-in-the-times-about-brooklyn-microradio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediageek.net/2007/12/free103point9-says-theres-no-news-in-the-times-about-brooklyn-microradio/</link>
	<description>&#34;Eclectic&#34; is just a nice way of saying, &#34;lacking focus&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:13:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Roe</title>
		<link>http://www.mediageek.net/2007/12/free103point9-says-theres-no-news-in-the-times-about-brooklyn-microradio/comment-page-1/#comment-48846</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Roe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 02:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediageek.net/?p=1587#comment-48846</guid>
		<description>Yes, the main point of my post was this was just some freelance schmuck trying to earn $100 from the Times (I know, I used to be that freelance schmuck.) There is news to report on the NYC microradio scene, this reporter just never looked for it, or didn&#039;t look very hard. Apparently, he read some blog post with someone complaining about interference and ran with it. Everyone should know by now to be skeptical of things they read on blog posts, but this reporter does not. If you look up FCC enforcement actions in NYC, you have a story. If you interview microradio folk in NYC I am sure you can find a story. This reporter did neither, and his &quot;story&quot; is not a story, just an invoice to a Times editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the main point of my post was this was just some freelance schmuck trying to earn $100 from the Times (I know, I used to be that freelance schmuck.) There is news to report on the NYC microradio scene, this reporter just never looked for it, or didn&#8217;t look very hard. Apparently, he read some blog post with someone complaining about interference and ran with it. Everyone should know by now to be skeptical of things they read on blog posts, but this reporter does not. If you look up FCC enforcement actions in NYC, you have a story. If you interview microradio folk in NYC I am sure you can find a story. This reporter did neither, and his &#8220;story&#8221; is not a story, just an invoice to a Times editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

